Amy Goodman and the pseudo-leftist media ignore Assange’s attack on US democracy

Amy Goodman and the pseudo-leftist media in love with Trump for his love of Putin have ignored Assange’s threat to American democracy, whatever is left of it. They are coming too close to Trump for his love of Putin, joining him as traitors of the people of this nation.

Hoping to get his freedom, Assange has worked for Trump since the elections. For his freedom Assange is throwing the rest of us who supported him under the fascist bus. Now he is helping Trump by devising a system to keep track of everyone who uses Trump’s favorite tool of mind control, propaganda and of mis/disinformation: tweeter accounts (see insert above).  What other reason would interest Assange on how tweeter is used but to get Trump to pardon him in exchange for his expert services in hacking, to have all users under surveillance, and critics blacklisted?  It is reasonable to suspect that he and Trump have been discussing his freedom in exchange of professional hacking services; just look at that piece of information and all the help he gave Trump during the elections. But that possibility doesn’t cross Amy’s mind, nor the minds of the pseudo-leftists in love with Trump. They are too busy protecting their other idol, Putin.

They preferred turning the US into the fascist playground of the global and Wall Street oligarchs as long as said oligarchs were willing to kiss Putin’s derriere, which many are doing. That’s all that mattered to Goodman and the zombie American leftists during these past elections: Putin. As long as the lewd candidate was speaking lovingly about Putin, there was no other national issue that mattered. As Trump himself said during his campaign, as long as he kept saying the things his racist followers wanted to hear, he could kill people on Fifth Avenue and not lose one vote. That was true too (and still is) for the racist ‘leftists’ who loved him for his love of Putin while he was trashing people of color and women.

This weekend, Goodman plastered her fake news website (she defends the WaPo and the mainstream media, as discussed in previous post, which makes her purveyor of fake news too) with pro-Putin propaganda. The “information” defending Putin is fake too.  Believe it at your own risk. But the fact remains that, to make sure you LUUUVE Putin, she went on a Putin binge and gave you PUTIN THE VICTIM  galore, with a couple of ‘other news’ interspersed for appearances sake:

goodman

goodman2

And of course, her HOPE that Trump the barbarian will pardon Assange is there, in that list of ‘news’.

I know, Amy is the Joan of Arc of the leftist media. But ask yourselves, Why wouldn’t she and the other leftist zombies comment about Assange’s  “suggestion” of  having everyone’s private info handed out to Trump’s government? That is an important piece of news, but they all had their tongue eating by the cat.

Assange is angry at the US, for good reasons. But he has proved he is no Snowden. Assange is willing to join forces with fascist Trump and use his skills to keep the opposition fearful of speaking out. Trump’s infamous tweets are the sign he will be using the social media as misinformation/disinformation tool. He uses it to threatens opponents with the wrath of the emotionally manipulated deplorables/zombie leftists who support him.

And Assange will be helping Trump use tweeter more effectively to blacklist anyone who opposes him. 

It will take many years to repair the damage done to our democracy by the ‘progressives’ who voted for Trump, directly or indirectly, Hold to your pants for the next 50 years of fascist madness.

And count on the leftists to turn you in if you speak bad about Putin.

OH, boy.

 

Advertisements

Amy Goodman clears WaPo and MSM reputation as purveyors of fake news

[Attention, grammar police: you need a warrant to enter this post.]

This article at Democracy Now illustrates how the media is covering all the bases, going everywhere to clear its reputation as purveyor of fake news after the beating it got from the public for demonstrating during this presidential election cycle that they are nothing but publishers of propaganda. Amy Goodman is working with them to save the credibility of the corrupt media by attacking Trump for ‘attacking’ the “lying media”.

Amy Goodman,  who has suffered in her own skin the media barons and the government punishing ‘alternative’ journalists, seems to have been coerced into bending over to defend the Bezos and Murdoch and Slim’s barons of the media.

Instead of using the opportunity to denounce the media, she joins in the effort to cleans their corrupted souls. You don’t have to agree with Trump, just use his own propaganda to show the truth about the media. But that’s asking too much from the zombie left.

Amy Goodman interviews Robert Reich, who is thoroughly offended by Trump’s cojones to call the WaPo and the media purveyors of propaganda. She tells us who Reich is:

“Robert Reich, who served as labor secretary under President Bill Clinton. Reich, who now teaches at University of California, Berkeley, has emerged as one of Donald Trump’s most vocal critics. He recently wrote a piece headlined “Trump’s Seven Techniques to Control the Media.”

I read the article happily anticipating Amy engaging in a powerful indictment of the ‘presstitute’ media, but not such luck. Au contraire, I got another heartburn by reading how the pseudo-leftist media is a tool of the big media conglomerate. Prove me wrong.

I’m giving you this quote from the article, and warn you not to look for Amy correcting this guy’ statements, for you won’t find any corrections:

that is designed to undermine the credibility, in the public’s mind, of anything that The Washington Post might publish. It is an absurd allegation. There is no reason to believe that the Post‘s reporting turns upon Jeff Bezos’s concern about Amazon and any antitrust issues. But, you see, by creating this kind of conspiracy theory or this kind of paranoid notion about the press and planting it in the public’s mind, the public, or at least a portion of the public, is led to think that anything that The Washington Post, or another paper whose credibility the president-elect tries to undermine, says is [not] justified or is [not] true. And again, that is terribly dangerous in a democracy.

How dare ANYONE undermine the credibility of our media? Reich went to Amy to help him protect the crashing credibility of our media conglomerate.

How dare ANYONE question the credibility of our media, the same one that lied to the public on behalf of Bush and Cheney to “plant in the public’s mind” the idea that we had to invade Iraq because of the WMD?

And finally, how dare ANYONE question the credibility of the media that gave us Trump by engaging in the practice of character assassination against Hillary Clinton and the 24/7 coverage of the fictitious emails scandal that caused a significant part of the public who trust the WaPo and the NYT to not vote for her, costing her the presidency?

As I commented in my previous posts, that coverage of the emails was tantamount to a premature coup d’etat. They were getting the bed ready to have Hillary Clinton impeached for the emails had she won the elections. But the FBI jumped the gun, and they got her before she set foot on the White House.

But don’t expect Amy Goodman to mention any of this. She agrees with Reich that Trump is ‘vilifying’ poor Bezos and the media.

There is no discussion in the article  about the idea that the owners of our media conglomerate, elitist billionaires themselves, have good reasons to lie to the public, mainly to protect their class interests  from the ‘deplorable masses’, the ‘angry voters’ who are threatening to put their heads in a pitchfork.

There is no discussion either of how Trump is playing a game for the deplorables, pretending to hate the media, just as he pretended to hate the globalists but is filling his cabinet with the biggest and most corrupt of them. Trump may be lying, but he is not lying about the media as propagandists; he knows them because he uses them for propaganda.

Those who know the media shouldn’t be attacking him for ‘attacking’ the media. Use the opportunity to unmask the media, not to protect its corrupted soul.

Maybe my post about the theatricals between Trump and the NYT pretending to be at war can help you read between the lines when he ‘attacks’ the ‘lying media’.

MSM (Fake News) and Trump: The Truth About Their Secret Meetings