Trump and globalists slowly but steadily turning US into fascist nation

Words that matter in current political events: Consolidation of power, cracks in the elites’ wall, one-party nation.

It is impossible to get a clear picture of current fights for political power without putting the pieces of news together, for our only source of information is the media news.

But we read the news as trained to read them: As today’s news, not yesterday news. The public receive the news as discrete pieces of information, and the least connections or relationship between the pieces the readers find, the most successful the propaganda is.

Connect the headlines that are related, then decide what the message is.

 

The CEOs of the media conglomerate (it means here the Bloomberg’s, the Murdoch’s and Bezos, the Mexican national owner of the NYT, Carlos Slim, among others) they all present the public with the same picture about our current political environment: it’s all about the GOP against Trump, or Trump against the GOP. They NEVER mention or discuss the divisions between the conservative and the globalist elites

The true power struggle in our nation’s politics is between the globalists and the conservatives of assorted ideological flavors, warring for control of our government. 

shameful seven 1

From somewhere in the internet.

Up until this presidential election, the globalists happily  controlled our government, politics and politicians from behind the curtains, hidden from the public’s eyes. For this they have always counted on the Myth of the businessman as political outsider, not interested in politics but in making money. This myth creates a physical distance between the little people and them oligarchs: The little ones see each other and the paid politicians, but not the hands moving their nation behind the curtains.

oo

Google for images of “myth of the outsider” and this is the very first image they give you. It is well known that Google and FB manipulate search results. They are globalists, so they want Trump as your first ‘outsider’.

That explains in part why the conservative masses (and poor Sandernsnistas) identify with Trump; they see him as the politically uncorrupted and ‘outsider’ businessman. But the media conglomerate fed that image to the public throughout the campaigns. Yes, he was lewd and immoral, but they never accused him of being a corrupt billionaire elitist. That would be akin to calling the attention on themselves as a class.

The most valuable personality trait, the one the media conglomerate made sure, day in and day out, you don’t forget, is that Trump is a businessman. Without it there’s no magic. The public then makes the subconscious association (trained by years of propaganda), an ‘outsider’, and the media reinforces  the ‘correctness’ of the association.

All of the above also explains the “angry voters phenomenon”. They want to tear down “the establishment”, by which they mean the political parties and the old politicians in it. They are not against globalism or capitalism, they are against politicians who don’t throw them a bone. That’s the way it has to be, according to the oligarchs; politicians are paid patsies. As long as the elite is invisible, the little people sees only corrupt politicians enacting the policies that benefit the oligarchy.

And that is how we arrived at the 2016 presidential elections cycle.

Donald the chameleon: Ditching the paleo and wearing the ‘future’

The Donald is cypher to the public, that’s how he likes it. He is anything he needs to be according to the times and situations surrounding him. The man is on for himself, his only alliance is to himself and his family. He will do whatever he needs to do to get you to do his bidding. He was a democrat until he wasn’t, he was paleoconservative until he became globalist. He was pro-abortion and non-religious until he courted the fanatic religious right. It’s called shameless opportunism

Right now, he is doing the globalist bit. He has to because he is no loser. Who has the most power and the most money on this planet? “We the people’? Paleos like McCain, Rubio or Cruz?

Conservatism, paleo or third-way, is old fashion. Hey, I’m not the one saying it.

Roy Bailey, a Texas-based insurance executive who also gave to Rubio’s presidential campaign, said he backs Tillerson. The resistance to Tillerson, he said, “sounds like old politics to me as opposed to a new way of thinking.

Rex Tillerson is the globalist in charge of globalist corporation ExxonMobile, its CEO. It doesn’t get more globalist than that. And per Bailey, opposing Tillerson = opposing globalism, which is a modern ideology compared to ‘paleo’ conservatism, which looks to the past.

But the ‘new way of thinking’ is not what you imagine. To be sure, the article doesn’t tell us what Bailey means by it. You have to use your political acumen to read between the lines the meaning of those words.

The new way of thinking is using Trump’s pseudo-populism graft the globalists’ cream de la cream directly into the branches of power in our government. It is a take-over of government by the globalist elites. The new way of thinking is putting aside the fears Trump engendered in the globalists and join him in a new America: a fascist America led by a new El Duce, a populists who can control the masses.

Anyway, that quote up there announces that with Trump, globalists won. They are the new kid on the White House.

Putin wins: Conservatives bow to globalist money

Image result for tillerson

Rex Tillerson and the man.

We see the triumph of the globalists, not only in Trump filling his cabinet with them, but in that every GOP paleocon is bowing to the king. I doubt anyone reading this would disagree with that assessment. It is so evident I don’t need to dwell on it.

But the globalists coup is painstaking; the rest of the conservatives are wishing and waiting for the best offers to switch sides. It’s a matter of time, but the offers are flying off the shelf like Wal-Mart’s prices.

At the start of the week, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) [anti-globalist] seemed bent on opposing the nomination of Rex Tillerson for secretary of state…By the end of it, Rubio had heard directly from former vice president Richard B. Cheney.

Robert McNair, a Texas-based GOP donor who gave $500,000 to a super PAC supporting Rubio for president, said he plans to call the Florida senator to coax him to back Tillerson.

Tillerson boosters enjoy direct lines of communication to Rubio

What are the chances that Rubio, under that heavy pressure,  will put his conservative values above half a billion dollars, and in the process disappoint the hand that feeds him, McNaire, the guy who got him that money for his super Pac? I bet no chances.

After Trump officially tapped Tillerson on Tuesday, Rubio released a statement saying that he has “serious concerns” about his nomination, but will work to “ensure he receives a full and fair but also thorough hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.”

These old fashion conservatives have no money, but they have dreams of power. Globalists’ money can make those dreams come true.

“Anyone who knows Marco well, and I’m one who does, knows foreign policy is his first, second and third interest,” said George Seay, a Texas-based Rubio donor. “I think Marco will plant his flag in that area.”

As I said above, the paleoscons are waiting in line for their turn to join the Trump magical ride. Paul rand is ready to support globalist Tillerson.

Paul said he has “an open mind” on Tillerson.

As you can see, this article gives you a picture of what is going on behind the ‘we the people’s  back. A fight for the powerful cabinet position between globalists and conservatives. It’s not the GOP vs Trump. Is globalist, with Trump, Cheney and ExxonMobile vs the GOP conservatives.

Putin is a sign, a symbol the conservatives give the public to distract from the real issue with Putin: that globalists want to continue doing business with him openly and officially, as part of the function of government, and paleocons don’t want globalism.  It’s not about Putin rigging the elections, but Dick Cheney and his globalists must fight that false narrative about Putin. So you hear them  praising Putin as peace lover and defeating the “Obama criminal Syria policy”.

Expect the GOP’s old conservatives changing turning their hatred of Putin into loving-everything-Putin. The hacking of the elections? If I were Hillary Clinton, I would take a long vacation to Sweden or some place away from here. The masses are still chanting “lock her up”; the oligarchs will have no problem feeding her to the masses if it takes the pressure and attention off themselves

The new way of thinking: the one-party USA

Image result for trump and the one-party nation

Image result for trump and one-party nation

This is a globalists’ coup, and they need to take control of the government openly immediately if they are to survive.

One reason is that they know, once they start fleecing the people of this nation, Trump won’t be able to charm his populist deplorables and Sandersnistas into obedience. Also, all of them, and specially Trump, know that he doesn’t have the support of the people; he didn’t win the popular vote. Trump is not the people’s president; he is the politicians’ president. The politicians in the electoral college will confirm this once they ratify their will over that of the people.

It is an imperative for the globalists to take control of the government, so don’t expect for it to happen haphazardly. These people have been working on this since before Trump won. The time is ripe for a one-party nation. The Democratic Party is dying, poisoned by the so-called third-way conservatives, the one who speak the leftists lingo because they are anti-globalists. But as we are seeing, anti-globalists are being bought by the globalists.

This is the bells tolling for the DNC, this could not have happened without planning:

Amid outcry, N.C. GOP passes law to curb Democratic governor’s power

…the Republican-controlled North Carolina legislature has passed changes that would severely limit the incoming Democratic governor’s power.

The destruction of the Democratic Party and creation of a truly progressive political movement is the only hope for black America.” Black Agenda Report

“The destruction of the Democratic Party” has been the goal of the so-called third-way conservatives. These are the conservatives who sound like leftists because they speak the anti-globalism lingo. These conservatives have aimed at the banishment of the Dem Party since the elections, joining the pseudo-leftist at Counter Punch and other online ‘leftist’ magazines in their misogynistic attacks on HC and the party as her ‘tool’ for doing ‘evil deeds’.

Bernie Sanders is helping them in the destruction of the party. While he was running on it, he never stopped casting the party as ‘old’ and in need to be ‘reformed’. Now that the elections are over, he joined these third-way conservatives to push the electoral college voters to elect a REPUBLICAN! Kasich.

The globalists need every government agency, and zero opposition at home. The two-party system is an obstacle for obvious reasons. Not much that is happening since Trump took the presidency has not been previously planned. The globalists have been busy working their international connections, and as evidence I give you the Taiwan incident. You see, the media conglomerate can’t avoid giving the truth in their news, they give you true facts; it is up to you to recognize them and put the pieces of the political puzzle together. The Taiwan incident was cooking since at least 2015. See my post Trump’s Taiwan Connections

There is an ongoing battle to control our government between conservatives and globalists. I have said it since the primaries, and gave you as evidence that globalists are winning the article about Dick Cheney coming out to support Trump. As I said then, Trump doesn’t have to worry about lacking experience running a government; Cheney and Bush Jr. and that despicable bunch of humanity has his back. They are counseling him, they are guiding him to create a wall of generals in key government positions to militarize the nation when the real switch from democracy to fascism happens.

It will all start the day Trump is sworn in as president.

 

The bloody war the MSM doesn’t want you to see: Trump’s War of the Elites

In a recent post I mentioned that the lying media (MSM and pseudo-leftist) refuses to publish opinions recognizing the now calamitous internal divisions and political war of the elites against each other: the globalists and conservatives of all flavors – neocons, paleocons, third-positioners conservatives, and everything in between.

The problem is: ‘we the people’ are the ones who will be spilling their blood after Trump is crowned king of the paleoconservatives.

Trump as the heroic outsider, not the ruthless paleocon

On the contrary, the owners of the media, Bezos, Murdoch, Carlos Slim (NYT), etc., who are involved in that war of the elites, have given us, since the primaries to today, the myth of the billionaire businessman as political outsider. They know that Trump has long been a paleocon, and even if they didn’t, they know and can recognize a paleoconservative political position when they see one. There is no space for these media CEOs to claim ignorance of either the ongoing war of the elites or of Trump’ side on that war: they are crusaders for their own faction in that war.

Why hide the elites’ intestine strife

They hide it from the public because the elite is clear that it is a war among themselves, that ‘we the people’ is not part of the elite and should not take any part in their war except as live ammo.

The warring sides, all of them, use the media to weaponize the ‘civilians’ against each faction. The ‘opinions’ in the media that pass as ‘information’ are nothing but propaganda to manipulate the citizens’ emotions into supporting/rejecting the different factions. That’s one of the political functions of the media, to manipulate the masses’ opinions.

Who are the warring factions?

For ‘we the people’, this is probably the most important aspect of that internal fight between the elite. If we can’t recognize the various members of the elite and the side they are taking, then we will continue to be peons on their chess board, with no say except ‘yes, my Lord‘.

But the dishonest media has made it extremely difficult for citizens to recognize the many warring sides. It hides behind the cult of personality the political interests of elite groups. All we see is Trump being attack by so-and-so, maybe a battle between the GOP ‘establishment’ against Trump (not against paleos but against him, the populist leader) with no specification of which of the various factions of that group is involved in the attacks.

The ‘establishment’ now is anybody who is not in Trump’s camp: globalists and non-paleoconservatives, with  ‘Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment’ as the most “evil” representative of that generic ‘establishment. The conservatives want to demolish the Democratic party and are using the pseudo-left to do the job. More on this later.

Orwellian newspeak in reverse

Another element that makes it difficult to recognize the different pieces that form the whole of the elite is language. I wish it were ESL but, no; it is the manipulation of political language.

The elite (globalists, but conservatives more than them) uses the same political concepts of ‘liberals’ and, more significant, the leftists’ old Bolshevist political dictionary.

Thus you read paleos and ‘third-positionists’ talking about “the lying media” (Trump and his paleos) and “the presstitute media” (Robert Craig Roberts and the ‘third-positionists in the leftists media – Counter Punch, e.g.), about “greedy Wall Street capitalists” and “anti-American-anti-humanity globalists”, just to name a few examples. These are the expressions of an angry mass of people, furious because they feel oppressed by globalists, big corporations and Wall Street. What this mass of people doesn’t realize is that the conservatives have the same enemy; but that doesn’t make them friend of the masses, does it?

The dishonesty resides in speaking and presenting themselves as liberals and leftists when their elitist and conservative goals are in exact opposition to the people’s. They publish their opinions in pseudo-leftists magazines, attracting with their anti-globalist verbiage the unsuspecting readers. That’s how Trump ended up as the modern El Duce; by pretending to be the enemy of the people’s enemy. Job well done!

What passes today as the American Left is not leftist at all; it is the conservative third-positionists speaking anti-globalism, anti-capitlalism, and anti-oligarchy. The Left doesn’t exist anymore.

…and the left-wing (to the extent that one still exists)… Paul Craig Roberts

Sorry, The Nation.

Next: Tasting the different conservative flavors: paleos, third-positioners, neocons.

Trump and the Fantastic End of American Exceptionalism

Humanity can’t expect to improve its lot when it places its hopes in immoral ‘leaders’.

That was me who said that. In all seriousness, though, that’s the predicament we all find ourselves on this planet: Who will we choose as our global leaders?

The USA has always pride on being the ‘shining beacon of hope of the world’, the example to be followed towards a society of free, wealthy and healthy men and women and children. The example we have given the world today is of how to achieve the opposite.

All over the world there are now politicians imitating our first lewd president in all his immoral regalia. That’s the first of three signs of the end of American exceptionalism.

europe

(That word, “opposite“, is significant in describing where humanity is heading to; I use it through out this post.)

Trump’s example didn’t  happen serendipitously. Nations are in a state of collective chaos, politically, economically, morally…Trump is the most egregious evidence that this is the condition in the USA too. Americans have always seen themselves as apart from the rest of the world, haven’t they?

But they have officially joined the rest of the planet in its maddening race to the bottom of the cesspool. Trump’s followers, including the zombie American Left who supports him, say that the appalling conflict of interest of him mixing his personal business with that of running our government, is not big deal.

Anyway, that chaos has been slow-cooking for the last 50 years, and the master cook’s name is Globalism.

conflict

The American consumers eating this cook’s garbage elected the Apprentice guy to do their job for them, to tell the GOP’s members who didn’t support him “You are fired”. Poor things; they have no contact with reality except through ‘reality TV‘.

I italicized “GOP’s members’ because his followers are not complaining about him filling his cabinet with ultra-right wing Wall Street and globalists men; the opposite of what they elected him to do.

Despite the above, the ‘end of American exceptionalism’ comes courtesy of the globalists, not of Trump or the deplorables. They own this orange mess; they know it too. That’s the second sign of the end of our claim to ‘exceptionalism’, that the globalists know they gave us the Trump virus that sickened this nation and, effectively, destroyed the ‘exceptional’ image.

Continuing with the ‘cooking’ metaphor, our master cook, Larry Summers, knows exactly what’s wrong with his recipe:

Donald Trump’s rise goes beyond his demagogic appeal. It is a reflection of the political psychology of frustration – people see him as responding to their fears about the modern world order, an outsider fighting for those who have been left behind.

And they see the disintegration that accompanies global integration, as communities suffer when big employers lose to foreign competitors.

That last one is very spicy: “the disintegration that accompanies global integration‘. That is a beautiful example of dialectic logic, the unity of opposites or contraries. He is telling the nature of globalism: a major contradiction in that it benefits a few but controls everybody’s way of life. It explains regular folks contradictory behaviors. It’s like a bad marriage: can’t live with him, can’t live without him.

The reader surely can see who gets the end of the stick in that quote. It is valid to say that globalism benefits only a few, or the opposite statement, few benefit from globalism. Our master cook agrees:

a project carried out by elites for elites with little consideration for the interests of ordinary people

With a recipe like that, it’s a matter of time when you will have to close the kitchen.

Elites can continue pursuing and defending integration, hoping to win sufficient popular support — but… this strategy may have run its course.

Globalism is kaput, it has caused all the havoc humanity can tolerate without violently revolting against it by sticking globalists’ heads in the proverbial pitchforks. The globalists have armaments against pitchforks, though. That’s the way they are going to protect themselves from the “angry voters”.

Trump is the evidence that “this strategyhas run its course. He is not the shining hero coming to rescue humanity, he is the opposite. He is like one of the horsemen of the apocalypse coming to deliver the last blow to humanity. But don’t say that to his local and worldwide followers.

We saw during the primaries and presidential election this man’s true character. He is amoral, his goal in life is to amass as much profit as he can, without any moral considerations. Well, you saw the picture, I don’t need to dwell on it.

The point is: Humanity can’t expect to improve its lot when by placing its hopes in immoral ‘leaders’.

I propose to you that this global crisis will continue for the next 20 years, at least; and it will get worse before it starts to subside. Citizens will continue acting and moving in opposite direction of their own self interests, as I have tried to show here.

Trump will drag our nation to the swamp; with him, there’s no other path but to the bottom. The owners of the media conglomerate, the Murdoch’s, the Jeff Bezos’, the Bloomberg’s, the Mortimer Zuckerman’s and the Carlos Slim’s (owns The New York Times) of the world will make sure you keep moving to the bottom and against your own interests. That’s what they did when they gave you ’emails scandal’ 24/7 so you would feel repulsed by Hillary Clinton and vote against her. That’s what happened, didn’t it?

media

Small group of media moguls, from left to right: Murdoch, Jeff Bezos, Mortimer Zuckerrman, Bloomy, and Mexican Carlos Slim. Did you know that The New York Times is owned by that Mexican guy? Just saying.

These media’s corrupt souls decide what you read, how to read it, and how to react to what they feed you. In that way they will guide your actions like master puppeteer. More contradictions: Trump called them “lying media”, implying they publish propaganda; the people agreed with him, but continue to trust the dishonest media”.

The only way I see the USA regaining its place as that beacon of hope is if its citizens intelligently rise to confront both Trump and the globalist oligarchy. But I don’t have much hope for that. The American people is still in love with capitalism and with globalism. I have described how they act in opposition to what they say they want.

The media and the intellectually spent American Left  have convinced the masses that the problem is not Trump or the globalists but the Clinton’s. They too own that virus.

To that effect, Sanders, some Democrats and the Leftists are trying to convince GOP republicans in the Electoral College to vote for another republican, Kasich! That’s the third sign we lost our prestige as leaders of the world.

With that display of intellectual dishonesty, the so-called leftists are telling us ‘don’t count on us to guide you or to give you the best thought out political analysis‘.

America has lost its place as example to humanity. Who will claim that torch in the near future?

The Woman Card: Fascism and Misogyny in the New Millennium (updated)

[Grammar police, STAY OUT]

Introduction:

Fascism is the ideology of discontent, at least according the description we get of its origins from books analyzing its history.

Question: Did misogyny disappear with the defeat of fascism at the end of WWII?
[Warning: This post contains irreverent opinions and one mild profanity to make sure the irreverency is not missed.]

If you say ‘no’, it didn’t, then you are admitting that it is alive and that our economic and ideological model, capitalism, is misogynistic.  So let’s look into it. Fascism and capitalism were and are misogynistic in nature. It can’t come as a surprise, then, that feminism was in the ballot this last presidential elections with the first woman running for it, and that there was a successful effort to defeat it.

Enter Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton ran openly as a feminist this past presidential elections; thus, feminism itself was in the ballot. And that’s how it came to be that the ‘threat’ of a feminist becoming president and ruling over our modern masculine fascists and their world had them very discontented. Even if she didn’t run as a feminist, these men still would have had a problem with a woman in the highest office, and misogyny would have still be used against her.

Hillary Clinton openly stated in a Rachel Maddow town-hall interview that she was running as a feminist; and her words at that international feminist gathering in Beijing on 1995 are well-known. There can be no doubt that she brought the feminist perspective to the elections, even if she had tried to hide it (which she didn’t).  So feminism had to be defeated. Did you expect the media and anti-feminist men (right and left) to say openly that they were against feminism? So, did you??? Even if she didn’t run as a feminist, these men still would have had a problem with a woman in the highest office in the nation, and misogyny would have still be used against her.

But that threat was averted on November 8 in the only way feminism can be averted, here or in any other place on this magnificent planet: With a concerted campaign of transparent misogyny. Feminism, not only Hillary Clinton, was defeated on that date, and we don’t know if she will recover from it.

Destroying feminism entailed destroying Hillary Clinton: the two were tied together, whether you agree or disagree with her ‘brand’ of feminism. So killing the threat of feminism was done with the powerful media tool of public character assassination, that of Clinton’s. Oh, it was her, not feminism, whom fascists and pseudo-Marxists hated; at least that was their excuse for the virulent misogynistic attacks on her.

The gun of misogyny is there, not in your hand but at the tip of your own tongue, an automatic weapon to be used any time you feel aggrieved or irked by any woman. It was a tool stealthily  and successfully used this presidential election cycle, but it has been in use since humans began to form into social groups. Don’t worry, I won’t go that far back. But I will discuss how fascism’s anti-feminism is a real danger for women in the Trumpist presidency, and how feminism was the issue at the top of this election cycle.

The Woman Card: Fascism and Misogyny in the New Millennium

Some people argue that fascism disappeared at the end of WW2, but no one can convincingly argue that misogyny disappeared with it. Why? Because misogyny didn’t originate with fascism; it is much older than it.

Misogyny was and is an integral part of fascism, but it didn’t originate with it nor did it end with it; it is a problem pestering humanity since, well, let’s say since God decided to side with Adam over that incident in His garden. From Eve losing her case in front of God  came the adage: S/he who is her own lawyer, has a fool for a client.

Anyway, misogyny is fine, thank you for not asking.

This presidential election cycle was defined by two important elements: Feminism an identity politics. The defining happened at the subconscious level, by innuendo; never discussed in the open. These two are the same elements discussed about fascism (as I discuss below); they are there because the human condition has not changed much; advance in technologically, yes, but not humanistically speaking. We are still living under the capitalist ideology (its advanced phase), and women continue to be the oppressed half of the world population based on her sex.Who benefits from saying that we should not discuss identity politics, like racism? White supremacists do. Who from avoiding discussing the oppression of women (sex slavery, lack of health services…)? Sexist men and the capitalists who benefit from avoiding discussing it.

Beginnings: League for the Prevention of Women’s Emancipation

Since its inception, back in the late 1800s, with capitalism in its baby-phase causing havoc on the old economic/social/political order, fascism has been the refuge of men who literally hate everyone who is not them and whom they can’t dominate and exploit. Fascism is actually a creature of capitalism, a reaction against it by the old dominant military and landed classes threatened by the new kid on the blog. It’s worth mentioning that early capitalism was a revolutionary and progressive force, despite its intrinsic contradiction, the oppression of the same working class without which it can’t exist.

Consider the following as a reminder of how proud the first wave of fascists were of their misogyny and their intent to keep women in the kitchen. There was, in 1912-1920, a German  League for the Prevention of Women’s Emancipation. Today, Bannon and Trump call it the GOP.

Capitalism not only brought the old order on its head, it also brought (not of its own choosing, OK?) the Age of the Masses. It makes sense that it did because capitalism thrives on exploiting people en mass.

The point is, capitalism and its era of imperialism came with its own disease: Oppression of humanity as a group; so humanity organized itself against it in terms of groups, identity groups, i.e.: socialists, communists, labor groups, ethnic groups, national minorities…name an identity, it had a group. And then there was that other group that represents half of humanity: women’s groups – Feminists and Feminism.

By the late 1800s and early 1900s, the European landowner class and its military subclass found itself in that soup of humanity organizing and fighting against early capitalism and its nascent imperialism. They were just another annoying group making life difficult to the new capitalist class. But it was from that particular group of humans that fascism came into existence.

Historically shared interests of fascists and communists: Because shit happens

Thus, among the many characteristics of old and new fascism you find: hatred of capitalists (today in the form of ‘hatred of globalism’), of socialists, of communists, of ethnic groups, of labor… and of feminists. These groups, according to ol’ fascists, put their own impure interests above that of the nation and of private property. Hello. Funny thing is, capitalists, then as today, joined with fascists against the masses of the oppressed, with the same arguments today as yesterdays. Let me explain, but not ‘mansplaning’.

Capitalists then, as today, can’t tolerate any better than fascism did a humanity standing against them, against their globalism, against the rape of the environment…they too can’t tolerate women organizing against patriarchy, that living ancient institution. So today they join fascism, and pretend to not be one of them. Not much have changed, people. The worse attack is the one you don’t see coming. You don’t see capitalists/globalists/Silicon Valley’s software kings pointing their misogynistic guns at you. You only see the GOP and Trump doing it, right? Wrong.

Let’s see how they succeeded in the elections to defeat feminism.

Firstly, the MSM (main stream media) gave the public one image of Hillary Clinton, one from that women’s conference, to sear it in their minds as the image of Hillary ‘the evil feminist’. It was the MSM’s view of Hillary’s feminism that the public absorbed, not hers. 

Image result for hillary clinton beijing speech media bashing

“Women’s rights are human rights and human rights are women’s rights once and for all.” The slogan that scared the bejesus out of anti-feminists. She can’t lead the free world with that attitude, can she?

Secondly, as I said before, misogyny is live and well. We see it in violence against women, policies purposely created to keep them in economic disadvantage, sexual harassment at work…And these problems are mild in the USA; worldwide they are truly picante. In any case, our capitalist industrialists, war armament builders and sellers, financial, and Silicon Valley tech giants are mostly men, and men at the highest echelon of power are (like fascism) by nature misogynists. This may come across as a generalization, but it is one based on reality, and requires another post to discuss it.

Thirdly, feminism has never gotten the approval of politicians nor the public in general. Just as fascists accused its enemy of putting their own dirty interests above those of the nation and private property, feminist women continue to be attacked for the same crimes. Bernie Sanders and the zombie Leftists (my term) have blamed Hillary Clinton’s feminism for her loss to Trump. How dare she raise women’s issues ‘above’ the interests of the white blue-collar men of the Midwest. For the anti-feminists in the right and left wings, economic issues trump women’ struggle for political power, even though the oppression of women is as much an economic problem as a political/cultural issue. The oppression of women existed since men learned to use their thumb to carry that big stick with which they hit women over the head to own them. Well, that’s the old cartoon; it exists for something.

Related image

Misogyny has been the favorite weapon against Hillary Clinton since she was First Lady (FL). The media vilified her for not acting like a ‘typical’ FL, for having desires for power of her own. And as I showed with ample examples on this blog, the American Left attacked her as a woman, not only her politics. They portrayed her as a witch, a prostitute, a bitch, man-eater…there was no stereotype of a woman they didn’t use.

Both the zombie Leftists and the MSM denied during the campaigns that they were attacking her as a woman and for her feminism, but after she lost, they blamed her feminism for it, as discussed in this blog.

There’s nothing I can add to the description of Trump as a misogynist, you all know it, except that the zombie Leftists defended him, calling the criticisms against him for those attacks as “unfair” and “unnecessary”. In their sweet anachronistic Marxism, they stated that identity issues, feminism above all, are not important.

“In my opinion, it turns bolshevism on its head by using race or ethnic identity instead of class identity as the supreme, mobilizing force in national life.” Peter Lee Trump: We Wish the Problem Was Fascism at Counter Punch

Another interesting fact to note is that, while the MSM was attacking Trump as lewd  (they never used against him the term misogynist proper), they denied they were using misogyny to attack Clinton. I guess that’s why they are known as “the dishonest media”. They ridiculed her for her tone of voice, for her laughter, how she looked…They portrayed her as more ‘evil’ than Trump because…she dared to want the presidency. Trump was presented as a buffoon, innocent and wanting ‘to stop globalism’.

No man who hates women want one in the White House, least of all if she is a feminist card carrier. It would be naive to believe that anti-feminism and misogyny were not at the top of these elections cycle. In the modern world,  capitalism depends on the myth of democracy and freedom for everybody, it can’t admit it is soaked in misogyny.

But hatred of women is not an economic issue, it is also a cultural issue, an identity issue: Men who identify themselves as too macho to let women ‘control’ them, vs the women whose place in society is decided by them. It has been with us since before humans organized in economic and national groups. It is truly a battle of the sexes. As long as men have the political and economic power, they control the rest of the culture of a society. With the help of certain religions, the MSM, public/private education…the myth that there is no organized hatred of women continues to blind us, despite the daily reports of attacks on women by governments. In the US, ant-abortion is the most blatant form of misogyny, and it comes in covert and overt policies, like reducing access to it for poor women.

So when the MSM made Hillary Clinton so disgusting in the eyes of the public with their innuendos about her being a dishonest “woman”, it was with that in mind that the zombie Leftists and the politically green millennial voted against her. Feminism lost, fascism won. Sanders followers rather vote for a fascist white man than for a feminist, all under cover of her ‘political crimes’. It was not only the emails, it was the 20 years+ of misogynistic attacks on Hillary that succeeded in pushing away the support for her.

On November 8, cowardly and emotionally insecure men of all colors, ethnic background and wallet size (and women afraid of men’s violence against women who fight back) breathe a sigh of relief knowing that no feminist woman was going to be their boss and at the top of the world. They feel now secure and protected in the hands of that virile and bullying white billionaire. They see his acts of corruption the way he does: A sign of  masculine power; as they wish to be.

There is a sense of social angst coming from Trump seizing the presidency, a kind of social premonition that he will unleash fascism in its modern form here and worldwide.

Because misogyny is its most enduring quality, hidden under cultural stereotypes, expect women’s right to take a dive in the next four years, or 12.

Women, you can’t count on the zombie Leftist. They are with Trump.

I suggest you bring to your fold the many men who are emotionally mature as to not be afraid of you seeking the same social benefits they have.

Until then, nasty women, don’t give up.

MSM (Fake News) and Trump: The Truth About Their Secret Meetings

Remember that ‘barrage’ of Trump’s tweets on November 21-22? They were a smoke screen to keep you distracted from the secret meetings Trump was having with the “dishonest media”. That was fake news.

Keep reading. See how the fake tweets and fake news of that day were created. It’s a long process, but at the end you will see the results.

The Media swears Fealty to the Don Behind Closed Doors

The oligarchy and conservatives of differing ideologies and bank accounts sizes are lining up to guide the Apprentice President and put their resources at his disposition (all highlights and underlines by me):

But we’re happy that he’s picking people who have that free market background, particularly because on many issues, he is a blank slate, so anybody with expertise is in an amazing position to shape his agenda.” On Trump surrounding himself with ultra-libertarian Kock brothers’ network members, at Politico.

The American mainstream media MSM is also in line pledging their support to the Donald, the man they used to call during the elections “a threat to democracy” and “the most immoral candidate ever to run for president”. They share much with Mitt Romney in that way, don’t they?

But their pledging is happening behind closed doors. It does matter, folks, that it is behind closed doors.

Trump met in private with the owners of cable and TV networks on Monday November 21. The next day, Tuesday 22, he met with The New York Times (NYT), first in private and afterwards on an on-the-record “conversation”. The problem with this is…nobody gives anything for nothing at the highest levels of the oligarchy or the MSM. The free market demands an exchange of values. But no one in the media is letting us in on that transaction. Pity.

In a veiled effort to protect the Don from criticism from his followers for having secret deals with the despised “dishonest media”, some media outlets tried to justify the secret meetings as something perfectly normal.

The “lying media” told us that week, after the meetings took place, that every elected president meets with the MSM before/after his (no female president yet) inauguration to set the goals, rules of the game, and understandings that will characterize their relation in the new administration. They explained that those perfectly normal meetings are held both on-and off-the-record. There’s a private meeting from which the public is kept in the dark, and a meeting where the media let’s the public in.

Note: You are probably trying to figure out why is this so familiar? Well, it has to do with Hillary Clinton. Of course! Now you remember, don’t you? The MSM vilified her as acorrupt liar and not trustworthy because she once supposedly said in a ‘secret speech’ to Wall Street, that every administration should have two forms of meetings, one private and one for the public. We didn’t get to know from the media her explanation nor the context of the comment. Only the fact that she said it was necessary to portray her as corrupt. [TRUE FACTS USED AS WEAPON:Spinning] She clarified later, but not published by the MSM, that she was talking on the topic of security of government information.

But now the MSM has no moral compunctions about hiding from the public their conversations with the man they said “threatens our democracy”. That same man,Trump, must have gotten what he needed from that private meeting with The NYT, for he came out of it gushing praises at The Times as the “jewel” of the world media.

TRUMP: Thank you all, very much, it’s a great honor. I will say, The Times is, it’s a great, great American jewel. A world jewel. And I hope we can all get along. We’re looking for the same thing, and I hope we can all get along well.

Knowing Trump as we do, we know he gushes for no one for free. We didn’t get the transcript of that private meeting, so we don’t know how close and intimate that relationship between the MSM and his administration will be. But based on the story they concocted for the public during those two days, we can imagine how close that relation will be. Too close.

Who Needs Who More: A Quid pro Quo a la Carte

The Apprentice President, as any president, will need the support of the MSM. In part to help disseminate the (mis)information needed to obtain public opinion support for his policies, whether from direct press releases  and friendly press conferences, or from ‘leaks’ to the media.

For example, the American MSM agreed to cover the 2002 invasion of Iraq on President Bush’s Jr. terms, agreeing in that way to compromise its independence and credibility. There were to be no emotional TV images of soldiers’ coffins arriving at the airport, and no free-roaming-through-Iraq journalists: Only media “embedded” to the military would be allowed and ‘protected’. This media policy aimed at controlling negative public opinion of the war that would have resulted as a consequence of uncensored journalists’ reports. Vice President Dick Cheney memorably stated “this is not going to be covered like Vietnam”. And so it wasn’t.

But the media moguls also depend on access to the president’s administration for their business of public (mis)information; and also because, as owners of the media, they are part of the oligarchy, they want to control what information comes out of the White House and Congress. Murdock and Bezos have interests to protect too. They are not called ‘the fourth power’ for nothing. Except that this new president was “tremendously” successful at vilifying the “dishonest and lying media”. A democracy can’t tolerate the perception that its mainstream media is the equivalent of Soviet propaganda state media. Be clear about this, when the Donald called them “dishonest and lying media”, he meant propaganda media. That’s salesmanship.

And this is why it is in the public’s interest to know how the media moguls and Trump negotiated the future of the media relationship with his administration.

So, as you can see, this situation requires a quid pro quo. Enter the drama.

The Apprentice President Episode01: Fake news – media ‘startled’ by fake Salvo of tweets from crazy president (this is good!)

As new president-appointed, the Donald had his first “bigly” meetings with the media in the only way he knows how: as a Trump event, pure entertainment.

He had scheduled, days ahead of time, meetings with cable and TV media moguls for Monday 21 November, and with The New York Times (NYT) for Tuesday 22 November. Both were to be off-the-record meetings, but the public was not informed ahead of time about the scheduled meetings.

As I discussed above, it just doesn’t look good for the new president to be meeting in secret with the media. So, they do what they do best: Turn the whole affair into a show/drama to keep the people’s attention away from the private meetings as they were happening. While the private meetings were going on, the rest of the media was in a ‘frenzy’ ‘informing’ the public about Trump’s ‘crazy’ tweets. Oh my god, he cancelled the on-the-record meeting but…wait, he uncancelled it!

Meanwhile, you didn’t realize he had already met in private with the NYT. The drama they created around the fake tweets is appalling in its deviousness.

The Fake News

All of the media made the exact same report about Trump “barrage of tweets” to cancel the meeting with the NYT.

According to the agreed-upon-by-everyone-facts, the media told us that Trump woke up early in the morning of November 22, at 6:31 AM to be precise, to start a “barrage” of tweets at that time about cancelling and “uncancelling” his meeting with the NYT. Funny thing is, the agreed-upon fact, that he was up at 6:16 AM, is inaccurate.

The first tweet happened at 3:16 AM. oops! Not one media outlet took notice of the discrepancy.

tweet2

Two different tweets. Top tweet says 3:16 AM. Bottom one says 6:16 AM. Different ‘heart’ and re-tweet amounts. {It was not a re-tweet. How can one tweet appear later with different time and yet with LESS ‘likes’  than the earliest one?]The first has more on all counts. link for top tweet:https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/801021596228091905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Those are two different tweets. It matters because, if I’m correct that those are two different tweets, they point at concerted deception by all MSM involved. The intention was to tie the public from early morning on an all-day media frenzy about Trump cancelling and “uncancelling” the meetings, with all the distraction attached to it, and with the intention of concealing the fact that Trump and the MSM had agree to, and were in fact meeting in secret.

The script every media outlet was to use went like this:

Trump ‘unleashed’ a ‘crazy barrage’ of tweets to ‘punish’ the ‘lying media’ for ‘lying about him’ (as in ‘they deserved it’). Their reports should all emphasize an image of Trump as being consistent with his anti-media campaign attitude and his promise to ‘deal’ with the “dishonest media”. And he should come across as castigating the media and making them scared of him, in other words, he must be portrayed as masculine and powerfully virile, even if ‘crazy’.

As you can see from the Google search ‘trump meeting with the media tweets’, they used powerful active verbs and descriptive words to describe him: he “scolded the media”, “slammed the mainstream media”, “openly [he’s no afraid of them] criticized the media”

In other words, Trump went OTT (over the top) of the TV networks and spoke directly to the American people, as his predecessor, President Barack Obama, had done on occasion. The intended message to the TV networks and to the American audience was, “I don’t need the TV networks to communicate with the people. I can use social media platforms on the internet.” He thus threw a spotlight on the shift of media power from linear TV to the random-access and immediate, on-demand-access content distributed on the internet. [Forbes mag: Trump Meetings Spotlight A Media Power Shift]

He spoke “directly to the American peoplethrough tweets, for crying out loud. They even compared him with Obama! And the message? He will be talking to the public through tweeter! Notice also the phenomenon I have called Trump Apologist: People who explain Trump’s behaviors and intentions to the public as if they were in his mind. That guy on that quote seem to be speaking for Trump.

from-google

From Google search.

And, finally, the MSM was reporting ‘live’ from inside the private meetings. They were not reporting any agreements about what kind of relations will exist between his administration and the MSM. Nope. They were reporting live that Trump made the meeting like it “was a f…firing squad”. They broke the confidentiality agreement to tell you how ‘brave that man is’: the Lone Ranger.

The important element to consider is that the message was sent across the media, no one detoured from the script. Consistency of message is key in the MSM’s fake news, as well as timing: They keep you hooked with a frenzied ‘report’ about ‘crazy Trump’ from the moment you wake up in the morning and for the next two days. Then it disappears. No one remembers that Trump met in secret with the media.

It is exactly what happened with Hillary Clinton’s emails: The media covered them 24/7 for one and a half-year. Then, on November 9, after they achieved the goal of defeating Clinton, the emails disappeared as if  by magic.

The public will remember the feeling of Trump going crazy that day trying to castigate the media into obedience. They will love him for it. But the details of that day…not registered in their minds. They will be oblivious of the fact that he and the “lying media” are working together behind the curtain to make sure the ‘deplorables‘ follow the script written by the owners of the MSM.

FAKE NEWS COOKED

The extraordinary events of November 21 and 22 were fake news and events. Faked was Trump’s tweeting ‘meltdown’. Faked was his ‘anger at the media’. Faked were the ‘live’ reports from “inside the private meetings” describing to you live how he was ‘killing them’. There is no way for you to corroborate that information, you must trust the lying media is telling you the truth. And since they all agreed in their reports, it must be true, doesn’t it? Isn’t that fantastic? You distrust the lying media but you trust the information they feed you is true.

Those two private meetings (the 21 and 22) were confidential, but the MSM wants you to believe they were willing to break their own interest in their own confidentiality. Fake was the ‘news’ that Trump himself got up at 6:31 Am to start a “storm” of tweets. On whose mind does it fit to believe that a man already in control of this nation will get up at that time to do that? Faked are the reports on the Donald’s ‘craziness’.

He is so ‘crazy’ that he is filling his cabinet with the top of the top of Wall Street, with racists and warmongers, all from the top of the elite world. The Murdocks and the Bezos of the MSM are not threatened by that craziness.

They are threatened by yours, for you did put the fear in their hearts. But now they control you. The media will accept being called the “lying media” as long as it serves the purpose of keeping Trump’s followers happy thinking that he is flagellating the “dishonest media”.

What matters is that Trump is putting the government in the hands of the most recalcitrant ultra-right-wingers, which is to say fascists, globalist and non-globalists alike.

The owners of the MSM, Murdock, Bezos, etc., are part of that elite. They belong to the class of men that will have no moral qualms to open ‘centers of detention’ for the ‘out of control’ angry voters threatening “the success of globalism”. To calm the angry voters, these elite will use the power of the media to manipulate the people’s emotions, to keep they distracted and entertained; to keep them angry and easily mobilized when needed. 

Welcome to the reality show presidency. The MSM and the elite will write the script for Trump. Just sit down and enjoy it. You may be called to be extras.

And follow the Fuhrer, please. He is courageous, he will demolish the dishonest media with his own brand of dishonesty.

Good luck out there, people.

 

Missing Hillary’s Emails and the New Lying Media

The mainstream media (MSM) drove the American voters to a frenzied Hillary-hating state of mind with its 24/7 emails reports since 2015 to the very last day of the elections. It culminated in her defeat by the Electoral College, and the installation as president of the other (by media ‘polls’) “less despised than Hillary Clinton” candidate, the first lewd president, Donald J.Trump.

There have been no more email stories since November 8. Mission accomplished!

That’s the political power of the media in action. It can keep you aroused for a whole year, and suddenly, you wake up…and it’s not there anymore. You go limp again. You don’t even remember you had it. Wow. Where did it go?!

The media decides which stories you read and tries to control how you  react to them. It keeps you busy when they need you active, and passive when they need you inactive. If you can’t see the power of the media in those two elements, the emails hysteria and Clinton’s defeat, you are at their mercy. Because it is clear that these elections were greatly decided  on the media manipulation of the emails story. The word ’email’ itself, during the elections, became code and synonym for ‘criminal Hillary’.

Did they work stealthy for Trump, and, if so, why, is a matter for another discussion. Today, it matters to know how is the media working with him now, after having help electing him president of the USA.

The new media frenzy, Trump tweeting about meeting and not-meeting  with the “lying and dishonest media” on November 21 and 22, gives us an idea of how the MSM will work with The Apprentice president to help him lead the people of this nation to support a fascist presidency. Trump’s presidency is already marred by him losing ‘bigly’ the popular vote. That his presidency lacks moral validity because the people rejected him is not even in question, it is a  FACT. This man has no right to be our president; that’s the feeling of the majority of the voters.

No president can justify the validity of his decisions on the people having  confidence in him when they voted against him. And the stability of the political status quo is automatically put on hold by the other angry people, the ones who were not initially angry, but now are because they were given a coup by the media. Yes, they know, even if only at gut level they know it: She lost on account of the 24/7 emails stories. The oligarchs are going to be needing  a whole LOT of media distraction to hold the people back for four long years. The oligarchy and its media have a vested interest in protecting Trump. And Trump needs the media and the oligarchs if he wants to avoid a coup d’etat.

The transcript of the meeting between The NY Times and Trump on November 22 gives us a hint of what distractions the media will be using to keep the angry people on check. As I will discuss in my next post, the emails may come back, the media will seek to make Hillary Clinton the sacrificial lamb, and continue to portray Trump as the ‘bad ass’ president lashing out at the ‘establishment’. Yes, the media and the oligarchy can tolerate a small amount of spit on their faces, but not too much. A “lying and dishonest media” was Trump’s code for propaganda media. A democracy can’t tolerate a hint that its mainstream media is truly propaganda. Trump has to make amends one way or the other. Have you noticed he is not calling them “lying media” anymore?

My next post I discuss how the media is preparing to work with Trump. I’ll leave you with the introduction.

The Apprentice President may be inexperienced on matters of government administration, but his expertise is on both MASS psychology and mass MEDIA

Armed with this knowledge and with the help of the owners of mass media in the US (they willingly gave him “billions of dollars’ worth in free press coverage”) he tricked half the American voters into voting for him.  Now, by the way he publicly managed his meeting with the nation’s mainstream media (MSM) owners Monday Nov. 21 and Tuesday Nov. 22, the Donald is showing us how he intends to run the presidency: As a ‘reality TV’ show. And the media is happy to oblige. That’s the topic of this post.

First, the Context

Winston Churchill once said “never let a good crisis go to waste”. That’s our modern oligarchs second golden rule, the first being “he who has the gold rules”.

And rule they will continue with the help of the Apprentice President, drawing out through him the benefits of this new millennium’s second political crisis. Oligarchs and conservatives with differing ideologies and bank accounts sizes are lining up to guide Donald and put their resources at his disposition. They are hoping to push their interests and agendas top of this administration by manipulating the new president’s profound and numerous personality flaws.

But we’re happy that he’s picking people who have that free market background, particularly because on many issues, he is a blank slate, so anybody with expertise is in an amazing position to shape his agenda.” On Trump surrounding himself with ultra-libertarian Kock brothers’ network members, at Politico. (All highlights and underlines by me throughout this post.)

But what crisis?’ you may be asking. Some globalists are defining it as the world-wide unrest of the minions – most significantly the American ones – provoked by the “success of globalism”. That much the oligarchs have admitted about their globalist project.

To be continued.

The Legend Of Donald J. Trump

This legend is woven with the picture the media, both MSM and Leftist, is giving the public of how Trump defeated Clinton. You are invited to create your own version and post it in the comment section. If it is really good, I’ll post it as ‘guest post’.

The Legend Of Donald J. Trump

Once upon a time, believe me, there was an amazing country, amazing. It was the shining beacon of the free market, or as its people used to call it, of the free world. Its citizens were all winners by birth, enjoying their great way of life. They had free elections and free leaders, fantastic real estate and bigly mortgaged homes. Sometimes they wished their leaders were billionaires, actually, they wanted billionaire leaders; but not that much for a while because their nation, they called it America, was a great nation in that way.

But these happy citizens were not aware of the silent plague that had silently been destroying, destroying for the last eight years, folks, their amazing way of life. It was devastating it, badly. They didn’t even know it was happening. But it was happening, folks, believe me.

emails

Happy citizens unaware of the email plague.

Eating their way of life was a plague of illegal emails, okay? These illegals were criminals and rapists; they were hiding in private but illegal servers (coyote-servers you could call them). But they were illegal servers, folks, or so I was told.

These illegals were turning the people into deplorable angry voters. They were so angry; you won’t believe how angry they were. Or how deplorable. Sad.

Angry voters battling each other due to the effects of illegal emails and globalists viruses.

These really bad illegal emails were difficult to detect because they couldn’t be detected without the intervention of the FBI and a weird-looking, albino-looking Australian, and they both had to wait to the presidential elections to realize the plague was there.

Subclass of heroes: Assange and FBI’s own Comey. They helped our hero achieve the impossible by dumping vacuous emails into the population.

The illegals, smart as they are, kept changing status from ‘classified’ to ‘declassified’ to hide in the community with the legal and hard-working emails, taking their jobs too. Dangerous. It shouldn’t have happened, but their non-classy leaders were weak. They allowed China take advantage of them and their people. Can you believe that? I can because they are stoopid leaders.

Anyway, there was nothing the FBI or the scientists could do about the illegals because they couldn’t read the illegals’ DNA code; the code was incomplete, no one knew what was inside the emails. All they could read was inane information, no smoking gun there. But they kept trying to find that gun, publishing their emails reports in the MSM 24/7 since January.

The source of the illegal emails was a mean woman, an old evil feminist woman, a sick woman, seriously. She was crooked-Hillary, you can’t believe how crooked she was. She should be in jail. Anyone who lets illegal emails in should be in jail. I will build a wall against illegal emails. Watch me. And Mexico is going to pay for the wall. They will, believe me.

Anyway, they couldn’t find the smoking gun because the crooked feminist woman (she was scary, folks) kept taking their gun away. She wanted to take their Second Constitutional Amendment too. What a nasty woman.

But then, something amazing happened, amazing and bigly.  A truly great leader, the kind the people really really wanted, appeared in their primaries. He was tall and orange, but his followers didn’t notice he was orange because they immediately fell in love him. He was devastatingly good with words. He told his folks he was a billionaire named Donald J. Trump, although he never showed them his tax filings to confirm his claim.

Nice skin color.

Donald, that great people’s hero, knew how to talk to the deplorable angry voters. He was tremendous. He diagnosed their problem: globalism, corrupt politicians and emails. The angry voters cheered his bravery and fairness, because he had both. Donald said things “the way they are”, fearlessly. He bravely bullied and slayed 16 of his early enemies with kind words, the kind of words that would shame you into your corner. And he insulted everybody equally, he didn’t discriminate. He insulted women as well as the physically disabled, blacks, Latinos, military families…even his own followers. He was a great man, great, GREAT fair man. A tremendous leader.

Legendary people’s hero, Donald J. Trump, mocking a person with disabilities.

Donald the hero told them he was their voice and that only he can fix their problems. They believed in him with the power of their shared conviction that conspiracy theories are true. He confirmed his fears for them.

So our hero Donald worked his way through the presidential elections to face the people’s enemy: the evil feminist person. She was tougher to defeat than the other 15 men and a woman he slayed in the primaries. She was conning, a trickster experienced in manipulation of the media people, and forced them to attack our hero. They accused Donald of so many bad things, all of them lies. They even accused him of being a pussy-grabber. Incredible. Sad.

No one believed he could defeat the nasty old woman, but he did. That’s what makes this country great, that the corrupt media and establishment actually gave him the presidency. He defeated that crooked woman, oh yes he did. How did he achieve this amazing, terrific feat? He was great, that’s how. And she was horrible, I mean, horrendous.

He defeated her because he was smart, he “rewrote the rules” and “trusted his instincts”. Donald was an outsider, which was a good thing because it meant  he was not a politician. True, he bragged about buying them, but that never bothered anyone. There was a lot, but a LOT of energy on his camp, he was high energy. Social media followed him; he won because “he had more tweeter followers than she had”. He understood the white-collar working class men. He related to his followers, and they related back to him. It was wonderful. He appealed to the deplorables because Donald is a billionaire and businessman; Hillary was none of those. Not one big business or media people supported him, but that was a good thing too for him; it showed his courage and that he was not bought by the lying media.

Crooked-Hillary was defeated by him because she was a woman. She focused on Identity Politics, race  women’s issues. She was more untrustworthy than our hero. She was a liar and crook. She voted for the Iraq war and had bad judgment. She was careless. She was boring, low energy and there was no enthusiasm for her. Women didn’t like Hillary. She didn’t care about white-collar men workers. She lost because she was old and too tired to campaign in the rust-belt states. Despite her experience in politics and government, she ran a terrible campaign.

The media people, the MSM, didn’t like her; they tried to help Donald by publicizing horrible ‘truths’ about her: how dishonest she was at heart, that no one liked her, corrupt and prone to mistakes on her favor. But they all endorsed her as the most qualified candidate because she had them by the balls. Nasty woman. But ultimately, she lost because the emails came back to bite her in the coo coo. The FBI found more emails and dumped them a few days before the elections, causing her to lose votes. Then the Electoral College gave her the coup d’ Grace.

And so it was that from November 9 on, despite Hillary receiving over 2 million more votes than our great hero, Donald, the media tells us that he defeated her. True, if it weren’t for the Electoral College our hero would have lost bigly, it would have been a defeat of historical proportions.

But that doesn’t matter now. What matters now to the media is that he defeated her, he triumphed and conquered her. They will  not write that he won despite the majority of the people not wanting nor loving him. The myth that everybody hated her and no one trusted her was debunked by 2 millions more votes for her than for Donald. High schools history books will teach that our hero was elected president by the love the people had for him and because of his great presidential campaign.

The legend of Donald J. Trump will go to history as the triumph of the one  who lost, and the loss of the one who won. That is quite an achievement and deserves to be in the annals of best modern myths.